Personal Value Reconciliation

Personal Value Reconciliation Michael Piers litigate 1, 2010 CMGT 350 I. T. Organization Behavior Mark Paxton The process of changing our thoughts, manner, determine and ethical motive in a global setting is how we reconcile and as a result, con practice to a socially genuine standard. This is often called normative behavior we act according to the appropriateness of conduct deemed satisfactory to a limited mathematical group. The rules of acceptable conduct are dependent on the setting what is proper(a) and wrong or socially acceptable depends greatly on the value of the people (and their respective culture) involved.As a result, the reconciliation of personal values is just becoming consistent with the actions, thoughts, behavior, values and ethics of our peers, parents, teachers, etc. The liveliness of this paper is to discuss the aforementioned compliance of personal values as they are adapted to a particular setting. fit in to the Concise Corsini encyclopedia of Psych ology and behavioral Science, behavioral manikining plays a large power in our education the difference between what is or is not accepted is analyseed through modeling.Much human learning occurs from sitting and watching, or from just happening to notice what someone else is doing. Indeed, more social learning occurs from observing others than from physically or verbally interacting and experiencing positive or prejudicious outcomes. Observation provides information about what may be learned (alternative behaviors, possible consequences, etc. ). When observation occurs under the right circumstances, it can result in immediate changes to learning or performance.Modeling consists of an illustrator and an observer, in which the observer has been influenced by the illustrator. The encyclopedia states that this sheath of learning has been widely applied, across numerous areas, resulting in learning or performance modification. Therefore, as thinking and reasoning beings, we lear n vicariously whether our behaviors are acceptable or not through pen or unspoken consensus, we conform. In 1971, Philip Zimbardo a Stanford University psychology professor conducted a very telling experiment in the basement of the psychology department.According to Zimbardo, The purpose was to understand the development of norms and the effects of roles, labels, and social expectations in a simulated prison environment. What Zimbardo discovered, among other results, was that the students who acted as guards demonstrated (through their assumed roles) a mildly sadistic shift in behavior. Further that the guards exacerbated and encouraged such(prenominal) behavior. In the aforementioned example, the behavior of the guards is likened to mob behavior a type of herd mentality in which a group acts in consistency sometimes losing sight of their understood correctness of behavior.Oxford Psychologist Henri Tajfel coined groupness for tendency of various animals, including humans, to for m in-groupsand to protect their group from outsides and from outside influences. Often group mentality, in which volume opinion rules, can force compliance through the desire to avert conflict. As a result, there are numerous examples of failures in assessment because of this mind-set religious wars, Salem witch trials, the space shuttle disasters, practice of law brutality, etc. According to Tony Robbins, pain and pleasure are the two major motivators that incite people to action.Therefore, to stimulate a desired change, one merely needs to assign more of one motivator than the other. In the forgo circumstance, if the avoidance of conflict outweighs the need to be accepted in a group, then the obvious inclination results in an action avoiding conflict. In a physiological sense, many organisms involuntarily adapt to changes in their environment the chameleon changes color, plants track the sun across the sky to gain photosynthesis efficiencies and many creatures sustenance within the various ecosystems on earth modify their behaviors as a survival technique.As humans, the means to a compatible coexistence is our baron to adapt. This ability or trait provides for the success of humans in a group setting. We reconcile our values and ethics as a survival technique. We model others, learning vicariously, act as a herd following or succumbing to consensus, and are guided by fear. In religion we are taught to adjust the rules or suffer the damnation. Therefore, we learn to adapt or become an friendless to society. ? Works CitedBehavioral Modeling. (2004). In The Concise Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology and Behavioral Science. Retrieved from http//www. credoreference. com/entry/wileypsych/behavioral_modeling Gonzales, L. (2008, October). Mob Mentality. National Geographic Adventure, p. 28. Retrieved from MasterFILE Premier database. STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT. (2007). In Dictionary of Prisons and Punishment. Retrieved from http//www. credoreference. com /entry/willandpp/stanford_prison_experiment