Adult and Juvenile Justice System Research Paper

Adult and Juvenile justness System - Research Paper shellThe criminal justice constitution, in U.S, occurs as a system of activities and institutions that ensure social control. Criminal justice systems function to deter or mitigate the activities of criminals withal sanctioning law violators. These systems achieve these objectives through various strategies such as punishment, rehabilitation and criminal penalties. These criminal justice systems play of the essence(p) roles in safeguarding the disembodied spirit and rights of the violators. These systems ensure that criminals do not face abuse from investigative and prosecuting officers. The American Judicial System has two divisions that serve criminals according to their judicial requirements. The Juvenile Justice System developed from the criminal courts systems 100 days ago (Harr, Hess & Orthmann, 2012). This separation was motivated by the goal of diverting insubstantial offenders from the excessive and sometimes pick apart punishment of the adult criminal court system. The Juvenile Justice System encourages rehabilitation instead of punishment. The juvenile and adult criminal justice systems disagree in several ways. Comparison and contrast The Juvenile Justice System reducees on the juvenile in need of assistance instead of the act that brought the juvenile sooner the court. Juvenile criminal courts occur in an informal setting with the judge having discretion. In the juvenile system, the judge should act in the interests of the juvenile. As a result, the system does not have provisions for trial by jury, rights to know charges and right to an attorney. Additionally, the juvenile court proceedings argon usually inaccessible to the public. Furthermore, the records of the proceedings are kept confident to reduce interference to the childs rehabilitation and reintegration in the society. The language used in these courts underscore the differences between the court systems (Harr, Hess & Orthmann , 2012). It is essential to note that juveniles are not arraigned with crimes but with delinquencies. Additionally, juveniles are adjudicated as woebegones though they are not blameworthy. The juveniles are also not sent to correctional or prison facilities, but to reformatory and training schools. The Juvenile Criminal Justice System has led to tensions between social control and welfare. This arises because of the systems focus on the interests of the juvenile and incapacitation, punishment and the protection of society from criminal offences. There also exist court divergences connecting the two systems. For instance, criminal offenders above 18 years are tried in circuit or district courts, but juvenile offenders undergo trial in juvenile courts. During proceedings, juveniles are not criminals maculation offender is usually represented by an appointee of the courts to advocate for the necessary rehabilitation actions based on the interests of the child. During trials, adult cr iminal proceedings follow incident based trails while juvenile offenders face hearings based on the legal and psychological issues. Adult criminals have constitutional provisions for jury trials, but juvenile offenders lack these provisions. During verdict and sentencing, adult criminal offenders are either guilty or innocent, while juvenile offenders are delinquent or not delinquent (Harr, Hess & Orthmann, 2012). A criminal offender will be sentenced to jail while a juvenile will be sent to a rehabilitation facility. The sentencing of a juvenile offender depends on the offense history and severity of the offense. In case the offender exhibits a severe or extensive offense history, the juvenile offender may face detainment for their safety and social stability. However, the juvenile off